This feeling seems to be a sweet affliction for our generation—fame feeds us and forces us to face scorn at the same time.
While Emerson College has trouble keeping strangers out, they are excellent at stopping students from getting in.
Our liberal arts coursework teaches us the ability to remain fully human—to develop ideals, to be empathetic, to read, and then walk in another's shoes.
I still find myself shrinking from a sexism I’ve internalized through the years.
Many people are afraid to come out as bi, in part because they know they will be told to pick a side.
But there's a clear disconnect between how Emerson advertises its amnesty services, and its de facto implementation.
I want the Oscars to grow and expand, but I can’t wait for them.
Perhaps the only way to circumvent a forced choice is to refuse to submit to it.
And although Emerson's new rule is cased in a humorous shell, the college's recent ban of the device, at its core, is a reminder that conduct policies shan't be set stone.
I woke up the next morning, however, with no unrealistic expectations for myself, and thus, no opportunities for failure or self-criticism.
The truth is we don’t deserve a right to bear arms, and saying this could get me shot.
This semester has seen emboldened movements and sincere attempts to push Emerson into a direction that more accurately adheres to its philosophy of bringing innovation to communication and the arts.
It’s presumptuous and ableist...to shame someone for something as simple as taking an elevator.
This is where we first learn who the protagonist will be and who will earn most of our empathy—Westerners.
There's a value judgement behind keeping Swift as the artist that the video had students mouth along to, and it's one that isn't in the interest of diversity or inclusion.