Quantcast The Berkeley Beacon
College Media Network

Mass. health reforms burden the victims

Issue date: 2/15/07 Section: Editorial
When former governor Mitt Romney unveiled his plan for "universal health insurance," it was hailed as a revolutionary new system that would benefit the more than 500,000 uninsured residents in Massachusetts.

As it turns out, however, the emperor had no clothes, and the people still don't have any health care.

The idea that the plan, scheduled for complete implementation by July, will offer quality care to those who currently can't afford it is pure fantasy. It requires those above the poverty level, those making roughly $10,000 a year or more, to purchase an insurance plan from a private provider.

The monthly cost of the plan, called Commonwealth Choice, will go up incrementally based on income until a $29,400 ceiling is hit. At this point, 300 percent of the federally designated poverty level, there will be no cost reductions by the state.

The system sounds good, which was apparently enough for the majority of local media outlets whose reaction to it could only be described as fawning, but a closer look reveals how truly insulting it is.

The precise monthly costs of the Commonwealth Choice plan are still being determined, but will likely be between $18 and $106 for those who just miss the poverty line and a whopping $200 to $300 for those who make more than $29,400 per year.
What if you're a single mom or a recent college graduate who simply can't afford those extra costs?

Tough luck, say state leaders.

Those who don't purchase insurance will be hit with a higher income tax.

Talk about punishing the victims. All in all, the plan benefits hospitals, insurance companies and most employers, who are threatened with a laughably minimal fee for failing to insure workers.

It's the usual suspects. Left in the dark are the ones policymakers purport to be concerned about: the uninsured.
Worse yet, the Massachusetts Association of Health Plans concluded in late January that more than 200,000 residents who already have coverage will "be forced to buy more to meet the minimum standards," according to The Boston Globe.
Page 1 of 2 next >

Article Tools

Be the first to comment on this story

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

Should Emerson designate a smoking area closer to the center of campus than 211 Tremont St.?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement

578 milliseconds